"Can I get a copy of my file?" - and who is actually asking
Requests for copies of a file, a contract, a court document or correspondence are among the most common things a firm is asked outside a matter, and they are also the point at which an efficient system becomes a disclosure risk. The work splits cleanly: logging the request, establishing what is wanted and setting expectations is clerical and can be automated without argument; deciding that the person asking is entitled to receive it is not, and must not be delegated to anything that only sees a web form.
Identity is the whole problem, and a web chat cannot establish it
An email address that matches the file is not identity - mailboxes are shared, forwarded and compromised, and a former spouse, a business partner or a journalist can all plausibly know enough to sound like the client. An assistant must therefore be configured never to send or link a document, and never to confirm what a file contains. It may confirm that a request has been received and will be verified; everything beyond that belongs to a human who can check.
Confirming existence is already a disclosure
This is the subtle failure worth configuring against explicitly. Telling an unverified caller "yes, we hold a settlement agreement for that matter" has disclosed something, even though nothing was sent. The same applies to "we do not act for that person" - in some contexts that is the sensitive fact. The correct behaviour is to neither confirm nor deny and to route, and that wording should be reviewed by someone who understands the firm's obligations rather than written by whoever configured the bot.
What it can usefully collect, and why that is most of the delay
Document requests stall on vagueness far more than on verification: which document, from which matter, what date range, in what format, and whether a certified copy is needed. An assistant that asks all of that at the moment of the request - and states the firm's standard turnaround and any fee - removes the two or three rounds of clarification that usually consume the first week. This is the unglamorous part and it is where the value is.
Say what happens next, including the part the client will not like
If identity verification requires a signed authority, a passport copy or attendance in person, the assistant should say so immediately rather than leaving the client to discover it after a week of waiting. The same goes for a copying fee. Requests that die quietly usually die because a requirement appeared late, and a requirement stated in the first reply costs nothing to state.
Frequently asked questions
Can an AI assistant send a client their documents?
Can it at least confirm the firm holds a document?
What should it collect?
Should it mention identity requirements straight away?
Who should write the neither-confirm-nor-deny wording?
Get in touch
Leave your details and we will reply. You do not need a sales call to get an answer.